Merkinch Community Web Logo
Tuesday 13th May 2008

Site Search
Site Links
Community Web
 
Printer Icon Printer friendly version  Email Icon Email us

image16.jpg  image31.jpg  image34.jpg
merkinch partnership

REPORT ON THE MERKINCH PARTNERSHIP PUBLIC MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY THE 1ST OF DECEMBER 2005 AT 5:00PM IN THE MERKINCH COMMUNITY CENTRE

Attendees:

MERKINCH PARTNERSHIP MEMBERS: Peter Corbett
Ali Locke
Bette McArdle
Ross McGillivray
Alison Berg
Joan Tracey
Alistair Murray
AGENCIES: Graham Strachan
Fiona Robb
Bob MacKinnon
Marie MacIntosh
Jamie McJimpsey
Lynsey Webster
Paul Neville
PROJECT WORKERS/MANAGERS: Colin Downie
Jane Wilson - Working for Families
Roni/Lorraine - MP33
Liz Murray - Community Warden
Catherine McNeill
Anne Sutherland
Jean Mackay - Jannies Hoose
Maureen Davidson - Health Visitor
Liz Graham - Corbett Centre
COMMUNITY MEMBERS: Dell McClurg
Anne McCreadie
Vic Rawlins
Margaret Ross
Clair Pieraccini
Roz Innes
Eosaph MacKenzie
Myra Campbell
Jennifer Lornie
Helen Geddes
  • Welcome and Introduction - Peter Corbett
    Cllr. Peter Corbett, Community Partnership Chairman, welcomed all to the meeting and briefly detailed the previous two partnership meetings that took place in 2004/5 and the outcomes from them.

    He then explained the format for the meeting tonight and emphasised that after this the Community Plan for Merkinch would be formalised and he commenced by introducing Graham Strachan who would provide a brief outline of Regeneration Funding and the need for a Plan. The information presented was prepared by Bob Mackinnon who was unfortunately unable to attend the meeting.

  • Regeneration Funding - Graham Strachan
    Community Regeneration Fund (CRF)

    Previously known as the Social Inclusion Partnership and renamed in April 2005 with 2005/08 being a transition period. CRF is awarded to the Community Planning Partnership (CPP) and managed by a nominated Partner (The Highland Council).

    During 2005 there was some mainstreaming & continued commitments from the SIP Programme with the main development in 2006/07 (subject to further mainstreaming or closure).

    CRF is administered by Communities Scotland and governed through a Regeneration Outcome Agreement (ROA) and Annual Monitoring Framework. Allocation of funding and targeting is based on the 15% "most deprived" data zones in Scotland (Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation).

    Closing the Opportunity Gap Target

    Regeneration of the most deprived neighbourhoods through improvements, by 2008, in employability, education, health, access to local services, and quality of the local environment.

    National Priorities for Regeneration

    • Build strong, safe & attractive communities
    • Getting people back into work
    • Raising educational attainment
    • Improving health
    • Engaging young people

    Regeneration Outcome Agreement (ROA)

    The Regeneration Outcome Agreement has to demonstrate Community Planning Partners:

    • strategic focus on tackling disadvantage and targeting of "mainstream" resources on Closing the Opportunity Gap objectives;
    • The use of CRF to target specific areas and measurable outcomes.

    Devolved to Community Planning Partners at local level through "local Regeneration outcome Agreements".

    Highland Community Plan - ROA Targets

    • Population - assisting disadvantaged individuals and families to improve health, employability and tackle financial exclusion by reducing unemployment and the numbers of people who are economically inactive;

    •  
    • Difference & Inequality - assisting disadvantaged communities to improve their environment, reduce crime and fear of crime;

    •  
    • Infrastructure - developing community leadership and capacity through provision of community facilities and assets that increase cohesion and social capital.

    •  
    • Highland Community Plan - ROA Priority Areas. There are 9 Highland data zones in the 15% "most deprived" - only 10% of "income and employment deprived" population. Proposed are 17 data zones to include more recognisable communities and take account of anomalies (would include 17% of "deprived" population). Indicative allocation of CRF is to be based on the population in the 15% data zones. Development of thematic approaches - i.e. young people, unemployed, with less emphasis on "geography"

    •  
    • Inverness Community Planning - Area of benefit, membership, targeting, geography & accountability. Community appraisals & priorities (Community engagement - informing and engaging communities in needs assessment). Local Programme decision-making, management and delivery (links with other "regeneration" activity). Links with other areas (East Ross & Wick) - Use of Community Voices funding.

    Peter thanked Graham for his input and continued by introducing the first of the following Groups to the meeting:

  • Presentation from Community Groups/Initiatives
    Linsey Webster Family Resource Centre
    Jean Mackay The Janny's Hoose
    Bette McArdle Arts in Merkinch(AIM)
    Elsie Normington The Community Centre - Gym Hall Project
    Lorraine Cran mp33 - Youth Initiatives
    Iain Clyne Inverness High School - REAL Project
    Peter Corbett South Kessock Environmental Company
    Fiona Robb Merkinch Development Ventures

    Peter again thanked all representatives who provided for the meeting a comprehensive update for each of their associated groups.

  • Group Discussions

    Peter then asked the meeting to break into two groups as per their preference to discuss the following topics that are relevant to the Community Plan:

    Our Environment - Health and Well-Being

    Wealth Creation - Arts and Culture

  • Feedback Session
    Following the group discussions Peter asked Rob Henderson and Colin Downie to provide the feedback for both groups.
    5.1 Our Environment - Health and Well-Being - Rob Henderson

    With respect to health and well-being, the Group acknowledged the six main issues identified within Section 3.2 of the draft Local Community Plan. However, a number of other issues were raised which the Group believed should be addressed. In particular, the needs of elderly members of the community were viewed as requiring consideration. In addition, the importance of improving diet, encouraging positive lifestyle change (e.g. smoking cessation, increasing levels of physical activity, etc) and promoting positive mental health were recognised.

    There was also some discussion about the long-term plans of some community resources (e.g. the Janny's Hoose and MP33). The need to clarify these and take them into account when developing plans for the community was appreciated.

    The Group moved on from discussing health and well-being to consider the community's environment. Again, the main issues listed within the relevant section of the draft Local Community Plan (Sec. 3.1) were recognised. There was a call to appreciate the importance of developing the whole Merkinch environment and avoid the temptation to focus solely on specific projects, with the Group believing that residents' quality of life would be enhanced by overall environmental improvement. Nevertheless, the importance of specific projects was recognised. In particular, options for developing the community's waterfront area were talked about.

    The session concluded with a discussion about the challenges associated with dogs. Fouling, as outlined under Section 3.1 of the draft Local Community Plan, was recognised a problem. However, the Group felt that the issue was wider than this, and raised concerns about aggressive animals. One member gave an account of a particularly concerning incident involving a fierce dog.

    5.2 Wealth Creation - Arts and Culture - Colin Downie

    Colin advised the meeting that Bob Mackinnon with Anne Sutherland and Jamie McJimpsy had recently gone to Invergordon to a seminar on "Community Planning" and they were subsequently asked to present the "Merkinch Community Plan". Feedback from that meeting indicated that the Merkinch Plan was not only further advanced than that of any other areas but that it was a well presented document. Colin would therefore like to take this opportunity to record thanks to both Anne and Jamie for their hard work and obviously well spent time on this document.

    Wealth Creation. Colin continued by noting that this second group had generally discussed much that is already identified within the current plan, areas that came through strongly were unemployment and job creation, particularly boat building within the area that currently benefits from riverside access.

    This is associated with low skills base and an adult education requirement through to training for the unemployed perhaps through access to apprenticeships. Fiona Robb noted that apprenticeship finance is currently available.

    Could employers within the area be encouraged to employ from within the community was another question, not always easy as any business must always take the best options available.

    Some of the older perhaps retired community members do however have experience, including business and management experience, can this not be tapped into to assist groups such as MDV perhaps on a voluntary basis.

    Arts and Culture. All felt that the proposal for the Gym Hall was a worthy project and that they were looking forward to the developments within this area. The group continued and discussed the Channel 4 Art Project and Colin asked Catherine MacNeil, AIM to take this opportunity to inform the meeting of this project that she is working on for the benefit of the community.

    Catherine commenced by providing a brief outline on "Memories". The idea for a reminiscence based arts project is a way of encouraging collaboration between all the groups already creating cultural activity in the Merkinch area whilst encouraging a pride in the local area by the younger community members. It begins with a project between primary pupils and senior citizens, brings in the literary group at the second stage and develops into a community production for everyone. It's also an opportunity to show schoolchildren from outwith the area a different perspective on Merkinch than they may currently hold.

    Channel 4 are asking for nominations for the creation of public art in 5 locations throughout the UK. Catherine is looking for community support from local groups for a nomination from the Merkinch area and had displayed information on the AIM display board in the foyer.

    Colin thanked Catherine and concluded by noting that the possible lack of lots of comments on the community plan could be due to the very well prepared initial document that was available and presented to the meeting.

  • Meeting Closure
    Peter thanked all who attended and encouraged those who work or live in the area to carry on the excellent work they are all doing.

    In particular, he thanked Graham Strachan, Inverness area Economic Development Manager, Marie Mackintosh of the Inverness City Partnership and Fiona Robb from Inverness, Nairn, Badenoch & Strathspey Enterprise.

    The meeting closed at 7:30pm.

MEETINGS

1st December 2005 25th January 2006  

This project is being part-financed by the European Union under the Inverness and Nairn CED programme.Europe and Scotland. Making it work together.

| community info | community council | residents associations | community centre |
| Janny's Hoose | mp33 | merkinch traders | news & views | history | Hijobs.co.uk's Expo 08 |
| areas of interest | notice board | map | merkinch partnership | merkinch greenspace | arts in merkinch | mdv | home |

Design & Development by Merkinch Technology Centre.
Content and media copyright © Merkinch Community, 2008.